On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:34:05AM +, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:26:59AM +, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to update the table? It'd be way quicker to use
> > > > lookup table than real-time calculation all the time. I believe you
> > > > can simply calculate
Hi
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:26:59AM +, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > Is it possible to update the table? It'd be way quicker to use
> > > lookup table than real-time calculation all the time. I believe you
> > > can simply calculate all the values out for 12KHz and 24KHz since
> > > you
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:26:59AM +, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > Is it possible to update the table? It'd be way quicker to use lookup table
> > than real-time calculation all the time. I believe you can simply calculate
> > all
> > the values out for 12KHz and 24KHz since you have the function. If
ct: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option
> table with function
>
> WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or
> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 07
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 07:22:31AM +, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > The table was copied directly from the Reference Manual. We also have
> > listed all supported input and output sample rates just right behind that
> > table.
> > If there're missing rates, we probably should update those two lists
Hi
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:15:26AM +, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > The table is not flexible if supported sample rate is not in the
> > table, so use a function to replace it.
>
> Could you please elaborate a bit the special use case here?
>
> The table was copied directly from the
