Re: [LKML] [RFC PATCH v3 04/11] swiotlb: support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE PowerPC platforms

2010-03-09 Thread Albert Herranz
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: Hey Albert, I've been doing some posting in this area to split the physical / bus address translation so that multiple platforms can utilize it. I was wondering if it makes sense to utilize some of those concepts (ie, extend it for DMA coherency) for your code:

Re: [LKML] [RFC PATCH v3 04/11] swiotlb: support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE PowerPC platforms

2010-03-09 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 01:11:45PM +0100, Albert Herranz wrote: The current SWIOTLB code does not support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE platforms. This patch adds support for NOT_COHERENT_CACHE platforms to SWIOTLB by adding two platform specific functions swiotlb_dma_sync_page() and swiotlb_dma_sync()