Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-28 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:07:48PM -0600, John Linn wrote: > Hi Grant, > > It appears that you designed the simpleImage around Xilinx FPGAs. Yes. > Since we have to initialize the 16550 UART in the bootstrap and there's > no boot loader, were you thinking we would add the 16550 initialization >

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-28 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:35:56PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:30:35 -0600 John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll try to better understand if we can detect the compressed device > > tree and if we really have to disable the APU. > > > > What's the reasoning for being i

RE: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-24 Thread John Linn
TECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 7:36 PM To: John Linn Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:30:35 -0600 John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> + * > >> + * Copyright 2007 IBM C

RE: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-24 Thread John Linn
8:02 AM To: John Linn Cc: Josh Boyer; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support >>>>> "John" == John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Yes it is compatible with the normal powerpc FPU. Ahh, great

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-24 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "John" == John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Yes it is compatible with the normal powerpc FPU. Ahh, great - That didn't used to be the case with the earlier fpu stuff afaik. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxpp

RE: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-24 Thread John Linn
: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support >>>>> "John" == John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi John, >>> +config PPC_FPU >>> + depends on XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT >>> + bool "Enable Xilinx Soft FPU" >>>

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-23 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "John" == John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi John, >>> +config PPC_FPU >>> + depends on XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT >>> + bool "Enable Xilinx Soft FPU" >>> + help >>> +This option enables the Xilinx Soft FPU attached to the APU >>> +interface of the PPC440 (requires DP_FULL F

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-23 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:30:35 -0600 John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> + * > >> + * Copyright 2007 IBM Corporation > >> + * Based on cuboot-83xx.c, which is: > >> + * Copyright (c) 2007 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. > >> + * > >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it a

RE: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-23 Thread John Linn
Thanks for the comments Josh. I commented on the others that Stephen didn't comment on. >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h b/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h >> index ccaedae..ec57ec9 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h >> @@ -99,4 +99,11 @@ static inline void barrie

RE: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-23 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > index 3934e26..94adfe1 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > @@ -483,6 +483,81 @@ config SECCOMP > > > > If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here. > > > > +config WANT_DEVICE_TREE > >

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-23 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:28:53 -0600 John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an early patch against the mainline that I wanted to start > getting comments on. > > I would appreciate any feedback. > > I already see a few things that I need to look into myself. > > 1.I'm not sure why we

[PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440 support

2008-06-23 Thread John Linn
This is an early patch against the mainline that I wanted to start getting comments on. I would appreciate any feedback. I already see a few things that I need to look into myself. 1.I'm not sure why we need to disable the interrupts in the bootstrap loader? 2.I see some SecetLab copyrig