On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:50:03PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:32:06 +1000
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> > + b power7_wakeup_common
> > +#else
> > + /*
> > +* We can't just use a direct branch to
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:01:24 +1000
Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 17:32 +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> From: Balbir Singh
> >>
> >>
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:32:06 +1000
Balbir Singh wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Currently the power management bits are broken w.r.t. relocation.
> There are direct branches from system_reset_pSeries to
> power7_wakeup_*. The correct way to do it
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:32:06PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Currently the power management bits are broken w.r.t. relocation.
> There are direct branches from system_reset_pSeries to
> power7_wakeup_*. The correct way to do it is to do what
>
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.7-rc7]
[cannot apply to powerpc/next next-20160727]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 17:32 +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> From: Balbir Singh
>>
>> Currently the power management bits are broken w.r.t. relocation.
>> There are direct branches from
On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 17:32 +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Currently the power management bits are broken w.r.t. relocation.
> There are direct branches from system_reset_pSeries to
> power7_wakeup_*.
Side track: we should really get rid of the
From: Balbir Singh
Currently the power management bits are broken w.r.t. relocation.
There are direct branches from system_reset_pSeries to
power7_wakeup_*. The correct way to do it is to do what
the slb miss handler does, which is jump to a small stub within
the first