[PATCH] devres: support addresses greater than an unsigned long via dev_ioremap

2008-04-29 Thread Kumar Gala
Use a resource_size_t instead of unsigned long since some arch's are capable of having ioremap deal with addresses greater than the size of a unsigned long. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/io.h |4 ++-- lib/devres.c |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4

Re: [PATCH] devres: support addresses greater than an unsigned long via dev_ioremap

2008-04-29 Thread Tejun Heo
Kumar Gala wrote: Use a resource_size_t instead of unsigned long since some arch's are capable of having ioremap deal with addresses greater than the size of a unsigned long. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. -- tejun

Re: [PATCH] devres: support addresses greater than an unsigned long via dev_ioremap

2008-04-29 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tejun Heo wrote: Kumar Gala wrote: Use a resource_size_t instead of unsigned long since some arch's are capable of having ioremap deal with addresses greater than the size of a unsigned long. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fine with me,

Re: [PATCH] devres: support addresses greater than an unsigned long via dev_ioremap

2008-04-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:37 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: Kumar Gala wrote: Use a resource_size_t instead of unsigned long since some arch's are capable of having ioremap deal with addresses greater than the size of a unsigned long. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] devres: support addresses greater than an unsigned long via dev_ioremap

2008-04-29 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:08:14AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:37 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: Kumar Gala wrote: Use a resource_size_t instead of unsigned long since some arch's are capable of having ioremap deal with addresses greater than the size of a

Re: [PATCH] devres: support addresses greater than an unsigned long via dev_ioremap

2008-04-29 Thread Jon Loeliger
Kumar Gala wrote: Its a pretty trivial patch and would be nice to go into 2.6.26. I would also consider it a bug fix of shorts for any driver Looked like a bugfix of longs to me... :-) jdl ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org