On 19/05/2017 at 22:18:55 +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> In function __rtc_read_alarm() its possible for an alarm time-stamp to
> be invalid even after replacing missing components with current
> time-stamp. The condition 'alarm->time.tm_year < 70' will trigger this
> case and will cause the call to
In function __rtc_read_alarm() its possible for an alarm time-stamp to
be invalid even after replacing missing components with current
time-stamp. The condition 'alarm->time.tm_year < 70' will trigger this
case and will cause the call to 'rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time)'
return a negative value for
