2012/6/14 Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Barry Song barry.s...@lianlab.org
---
Based on
Wolfram == Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de writes:
Wolfram Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should
Wolfram be done in the core, like we already do with board_info
Wolfram structs.
Wolfram Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
Wolfram ---
Wolfram
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
---
diff --git
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:33:37AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-versatile.c |1 -
Hi Wolfram,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:12:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
---
Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build tested,
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 11:14 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:33:37AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
---
Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build tested, I don't have a OF based device
around at the moment.
@Peter: Why does
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
---
Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build tested, I don't have a
On 06/13/2012 03:12 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
At least on Tegra this works fine,
Tested-by: Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:12:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
FWIW, and without any actual
12 matches
Mail list logo