Re: [PATCH] i2c-cpm: Fix to takeback i2c bus master-ship after a collision

2012-11-25 Thread sachin surendran
Hi Kumar, I have resent the updated patch. Regards Sachin On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:00 PM, sachin surendran wrote: > >> In case of collision on i2c bus the controller which lost bus mastership >> stays as a slave >> for all subseq

Re: [PATCH] i2c-cpm: Fix to takeback i2c bus master-ship after a collision

2012-11-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:00 PM, sachin surendran wrote: > In case of collision on i2c bus the controller which lost bus mastership > stays as a slave > for all subsequent transfers. This results in the i2c controller never > writing to the bus > for future transactions, resulting in i2c transfer

Re: [PATCH] i2c-cpm: Fix to takeback i2c bus master-ship after a collision

2012-10-31 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Sachin, looks good to me. Acked-By: Jochen Friedrich Signed-off-by: Sachin Surendran mailto:sachin.surend...@alliedtelesis.co.nz>> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cpm.c |8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cpm.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cpm.c

[PATCH] i2c-cpm: Fix to takeback i2c bus master-ship after a collision

2012-10-31 Thread sachin surendran
In case of collision on i2c bus the controller which lost bus mastership stays as a slave for all subsequent transfers. This results in the i2c controller never writing to the bus for future transactions, resulting in i2c transfer timeouts. This fix checks for a collision on last I2C transaction