Hi Christophe,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.19-rc8 next-20181019]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Christophe,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.19-rc8 next-20181019]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Le 19/10/2018 à 12:01, Juergen Gross a écrit :
On 19/10/2018 11:29, Christophe Leroy wrote:
commit d7880812b359 ("idle: Add the stack canary init to
cpu_startup_entry()") added the call to boot_init_stack_canary()
in cpu_startup_entry() in an #ifdef CONFIG_X86 statement, with
the intention
On 19/10/2018 11:29, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> commit d7880812b359 ("idle: Add the stack canary init to
> cpu_startup_entry()") added the call to boot_init_stack_canary()
> in cpu_startup_entry() in an #ifdef CONFIG_X86 statement, with
> the intention to remove that #ifdef later.
>
> While
commit d7880812b359 ("idle: Add the stack canary init to
cpu_startup_entry()") added the call to boot_init_stack_canary()
in cpu_startup_entry() in an #ifdef CONFIG_X86 statement, with
the intention to remove that #ifdef later.
While implementing stack protector for powerpc, it has been
observed
