Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-19 Thread Thomas Huth
On 18.05.2016 12:53, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18.05.2016 12:18, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 17.05.2016 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-18 Thread Thomas Huth
On 18.05.2016 12:53, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18.05.2016 12:18, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 17.05.2016 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-18 Thread Thomas Huth
On 18.05.2016 12:18, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 17.05.2016 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> >> On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote:

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-18 Thread Thomas Huth
On 17.05.2016 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-17 Thread Laurent Vivier
On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > On 11/05/2016 13:49, Alexander Graf wrote:

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-17 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 11/05/2016 13:49, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 11/05/2016 12:35,

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-17 Thread Laurent Vivier
On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> On 11/05/2016 13:49, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote:

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-12 Thread Laurent Vivier
On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> On 11/05/2016 13:49, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-12 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 11/05/2016 13:49, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote: On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-12 Thread Laurent Vivier
On 11/05/2016 13:49, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, I've found that illegal

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-11 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote: On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr, while it is

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-11 Thread Laurent Vivier
On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, >> I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with >> kvm-pr, >> while it is fine with kvm-hv. >> >> When an

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-11 Thread Alexander Graf
On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr, while it is fine with kvm-hv. When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by kvm-pr, the

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-10 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 09/05/2016 10:14, Thomas Huth wrote: >> > Tested-by: Thomas Huth > Ping! > > Alex, Paul, could you please pick up this patch? This patch is required > to get the kvm-unit-tests working properly with kvm-pr, so I'd be glad > if we could get this included finally... I have

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-05-09 Thread Thomas Huth
On 21.04.2016 11:25, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 15.03.2016 21:18, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, >> I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr, >> while it is fine with kvm-hv. >> >> When an illegal

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-04-21 Thread Thomas Huth
On 15.03.2016 21:18, Laurent Vivier wrote: > While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, > I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr, > while it is fine with kvm-hv. > > When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by kvm-pr,

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-04-07 Thread Laurent Vivier
Ping? On 15/03/2016 21:18, Laurent Vivier wrote: > While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, > I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr, > while it is fine with kvm-hv. > > When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by

Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-03-22 Thread Laurent Vivier
Hi, as Paolo has merged the test into kvm-unit-tests, this patch (and original bug) can be now tested with it. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git at least: be9b007 powerpc: add test to check invalid instruction trap Run this with KVM-PR and check your dmesg:

[PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions

2016-03-15 Thread Laurent Vivier
While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc, I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr, while it is fine with kvm-hv. When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by kvm-pr, the kernel logs are filled with: Couldn't