On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:16 AM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 10:31 PM Christophe Leroy
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 09/01/2019 à 02:14, Kees Cook a écrit :
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:26 AM Christophe Leroy
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Introduce lkdtm tests for NULL pointer
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 10:31 PM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 09/01/2019 à 02:14, Kees Cook a écrit :
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:26 AM Christophe Leroy
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Introduce lkdtm tests for NULL pointer dereference: check
> >> access or exec at NULL address.
> >
> > Why is this
Le 09/01/2019 à 02:14, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:26 AM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
Introduce lkdtm tests for NULL pointer dereference: check
access or exec at NULL address.
Why is this not already covered by the existing tests? (Is there
something special about NULL that
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:26 AM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
> Introduce lkdtm tests for NULL pointer dereference: check
> access or exec at NULL address.
Why is this not already covered by the existing tests? (Is there
something special about NULL that is being missed?) I'd expect SMAP
and SMEP to
Introduce lkdtm tests for NULL pointer dereference: check
access or exec at NULL address.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c | 2 ++
drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h | 2 ++
drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c | 18 ++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git
