Hi Grant,
the patch referenced above is a little ugly. Adding the call should
Agreed. I just referenced it to show there are more people wanting this
feature.
be really simple. I've drafted a patch to do only that step and
attached it to this mail. If this one works for you, then I'll
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Also, I'm resistant to changing the probe layout on this driver at
this time. With the work being done to generalize the OF support
code, there is a strong possibility that of_platform will be
deprecated in favor of
Hi Stephen,
static struct of_platform_driver mpc52xx_psc_spi_of_driver = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .name = mpc52xx-psc-spi,
+ .name = DRIVER_NAME,
You no longer need to set either owner or name in the of_platform driver,
just in the included struct driver (as is done below),
Hi Wolfram,
Thanks for this work. Comments below.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
This driver has a generic part for the probe/remove routines which probably
used to be called from a platform driver and an of_platform driver. Meanwhile,
the driver is
This driver has a generic part for the probe/remove routines which probably
used to be called from a platform driver and an of_platform driver. Meanwhile,
the driver is of_platform only, so there is no need for the generic part
anymore. Unifying probe/remove finally enables us to call
Hi Wolfram,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:44:12 +0100 Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
static struct of_platform_driver mpc52xx_psc_spi_of_driver = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .name = mpc52xx-psc-spi,
+ .name = DRIVER_NAME,
You no longer need to set either owner or name in
