On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles.
> The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose->first_busno because PCI core
> sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe
> controller actually takes the
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 01:54:35AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles.
> The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose->first_busno because PCI core
> sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe
> controller actuall
It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles.
The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose->first_busno because PCI core
sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe
controller actually takes the registers into account. So we should use
just bus->number.
A
