Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl_pci: Fix P2P bridge handling for MPC83xx PCIe controllers

2009-12-09 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 01:54:35AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles. The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose-first_busno because PCI core sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe controller actually

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl_pci: Fix P2P bridge handling for MPC83xx PCIe controllers

2009-12-09 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles. The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose-first_busno because PCI core sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe controller actually takes the

[PATCH] powerpc/fsl_pci: Fix P2P bridge handling for MPC83xx PCIe controllers

2009-12-07 Thread Anton Vorontsov
It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles. The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose-first_busno because PCI core sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe controller actually takes the registers into account. So we should use just bus-number.