On 07/09/2017 22:51, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2017, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>
>> The commit b5c8f0fd595d ("powerpc/mm: Rework mm_fault_error()") reviewed
>> the way the error path is managed in __do_page_fault() but it was a bit too
>> agressive when handling a case by returning
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017, Laurent Dufour wrote:
The commit b5c8f0fd595d ("powerpc/mm: Rework mm_fault_error()") reviewed
the way the error path is managed in __do_page_fault() but it was a bit too
agressive when handling a case by returning without releasing the mmap_sem.
By the way, replacing
The commit b5c8f0fd595d ("powerpc/mm: Rework mm_fault_error()") reviewed
the way the error path is managed in __do_page_fault() but it was a bit too
agressive when handling a case by returning without releasing the mmap_sem.
By the way, replacing current->mm->mmap_sem by mm->mmap_sem as mm is set
