On Mon, 25 May 2020 15:50:04 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> The code patching code wants to get the value of a struct ppc_inst as
> a u64 when the instruction is prefixed, so we can pass the u64 down to
> __put_user_asm() and write it with a single store.
>
> This is a bit awkward because the va
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:49 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> The code patching code wants to get the value of a struct ppc_inst as
Might need to change the wording here as it also gets used in
arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe()
> a u64 when the instruction is prefixed, so we can pass the u64 down to
>
The code patching code wants to get the value of a struct ppc_inst as
a u64 when the instruction is prefixed, so we can pass the u64 down to
__put_user_asm() and write it with a single store.
This is a bit awkward because the value differs based on the CPU
endianness, so add a helper to do the con
