On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> There's no reason I'm aware of that the VMX copy loop shouldn't work on
> PPC970. And in fact it seems to boot and generally be happy.
But is it faster?
Segher
___
Linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 02:08 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > There's no reason I'm aware of that the VMX copy loop shouldn't work on
> > PPC970. And in fact it seems to boot and generally be happy.
>
> But is it faster?
Well
On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:51 +0100, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2016, 11:25:27 schrieb Michael Ellerman:
> > There's no reason I'm aware of that the VMX copy loop shouldn't work on
> > PPC970. And in fact it seems to boot and generally be happy.
>
> does the same also hold
Am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2016, 11:25:27 schrieb Michael Ellerman:
> There's no reason I'm aware of that the VMX copy loop shouldn't work on
> PPC970. And in fact it seems to boot and generally be happy.
does the same also hold for Cell? Maybe there are even more optimizations
which can be
There's no reason I'm aware of that the VMX copy loop shouldn't work on
PPC970. And in fact it seems to boot and generally be happy.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git