On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:41:47AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, Will Schmidt wrote:
- if (panic_timeout)
- return;
This change is wrong. Booting
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 16:56 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:15:59 -0600 Will Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(resending with the proper from addr this time).
I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
patch.A /sbin/reboot is now
Will Schmidt wrote:
From my reading of the papr, I've got the impression that there are two
possibilities.
First, the os-term never returns, and it's up to the service processor
to do whatever it's going to do. (call home, dump, something else).
Nothing we can do there.
Second,
On Wed, Nov 28, Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, Will Schmidt wrote:
- if (panic_timeout)
- return;
This change is wrong. Booting with panic=123 really means the system
has to reboot in 123
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:18 -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:15:59PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
(resending with the proper from addr this time).
I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
patch.A /sbin/reboot is now behaving much
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:15:59 -0600 Will Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(resending with the proper from addr this time).
I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
patch.A /sbin/reboot is now behaving much more like a
/sbin/halt.
Anybody else seeing
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:15:59PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
(resending with the proper from addr this time).
I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
patch.A /sbin/reboot is now behaving much more like a
/sbin/halt.
Anybody else seeing this, or is it
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, Will Schmidt wrote:
-void rtas_os_term(char *str)
+void rtas_panic_msg(char *str)
- if (panic_timeout)
- return;
This change is wrong. Booting with panic=123 really means the system
has to
The rtas_os_term() routine was being called at the wrong time.
The actual rtas call os-term will not ever return, and so
calling it from the panic notifier is too early. Instead,
call it from the machine_reset() call.
The patch splits the rtas_os_term() routine into two: one
part to capture
