Nathan Lynch wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
We need to pass the kernel stack pointer instead of the user space
stack pointer in save_stack_trace_tsk().
Thanks, this fixes it, and latencytop even seems to work. :)
Sweet. One week from mention to working in -next...not bad.
My thanks to Arnd
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We need to pass the kernel stack pointer instead of the user space
> stack pointer in save_stack_trace_tsk().
Thanks, this fixes it, and latencytop even seems to work. :)
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https:
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:12 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We need to pass the kernel stack pointer instead of the user space
> stack pointer in save_stack_trace_tsk().
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > Arnd Bergmann wrote:
We need to pass the kernel stack pointer instead of the user space
stack pointer in save_stack_trace_tsk().
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Implement save_stack_trace_tsk on powerpc, so that we can run with