On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 07:19:57AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 27/03/2019 à 19:21, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >Yeah, okay, we should have some PHDRS statement here still. You can drop
> >the dummy segment, and the notes segment as well, or you can keep the notes
> >section in both the
Le 27/03/2019 à 19:21, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:47:55AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:40:32AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
I tried to reproduce this. It does not fail with a
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:47:55AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:40:32AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > >I tried to reproduce this. It does not fail with a ppc6xx_defconfig
> > >build, and
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:40:32AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >I tried to reproduce this. It does not fail with a ppc6xx_defconfig
> >build, and mpc885_ads_defconfig fails with
>
> So far, the only defconfig which fails for me is
Le 27/03/2019 à 09:56, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 26/03/2019 à 21:12, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 21:12, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr
Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:31PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:29:43PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:31PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > > >On Tue, Mar
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:31PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > >On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >>STACK off
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**4
> >> filesz
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**4
filesz 0x memsz 0x flags rwx
You need to prevent this one somehow. What
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**4
> filesz 0x memsz 0x flags rwx
You need to prevent this one somehow. What object file forces this?
Setting the program headers
Le 26/03/2019 à 01:55, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Joel Stanley writes:
Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
This is mostly a revert of c6995fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
binutils < 2.18 and GCC
On 03/26/2019 12:55 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Joel Stanley writes:
Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
This is mostly a revert of c6995fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
binutils < 2.18 and GCC <
Joel Stanley writes:
> Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
> 4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
>
> This is mostly a revert of c6995fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
> binutils < 2.18 and GCC < 4.2").
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley
> ---
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:02:53AM +1030, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
>> 4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
>
> It was a bug in binutils _before_ 2.18, only seen by people using GCC
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:02:53AM +1030, Joel Stanley wrote:
> Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
> 4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
It was a bug in binutils _before_ 2.18, only seen by people using GCC
_before_ 4.2.
It's all ancient
Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
This is mostly a revert of c6995fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
binutils < 2.18 and GCC < 4.2").
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
18 matches
Mail list logo