On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 19:04:33 +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> interfaces.
>
> We expect these fields to be NUL-terminated as the property names from
>
Kees,
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 07:04:33PM +, Justin Stitt wrote:
>> strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
>> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
>> interfaces.
> Yeah, this conversion looks correct to me too.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 07:04:33PM +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> interfaces.
>
> We expect these fields to be NUL-terminated as the property names from
>
strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
[1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
interfaces.
We expect these fields to be NUL-terminated as the property names from
which they are derived are also NUL-terminated.
Moreover, NUL-padding is
