NO_IRQ may be defined as '(unsigned int) -1' in some architectures
(arm, sh ...), and either may not be defined in some architectures
which can enable SND_SOC_FSL_SSI (e.g. allmodconfig for arc).

When irq_of_parse_and_map() fails, it will always return 0, so need let
checking none-zero instead of checking NO_IRQ, or will cause compiling
issue or run time bug in some architectures.


Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
index 6ac8730..6c17d3e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
@@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ static int fsl_ssi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        ssi_private->ssi_phys = res.start;
 
        ssi_private->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
-       if (ssi_private->irq == NO_IRQ) {
+       if (!ssi_private->irq) {
                dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq for node %s\n", np->full_name);
                return -ENXIO;
        }
-- 
1.7.7.6
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to