as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced
with corresponding pr_* macros.
this patch will generate warning from checkpatch as it only did printk
replacement and didnot fixed the other warning of :
Alignment should match open parenthesis and
Possible unnecessary 'out of
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced
with corresponding pr_* macros.
Are you simply running checkpatch on every file and decided to do
something about it? :)
I'll let Takashi decide whether to take this or
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced
with corresponding pr_* macros.
Are you simply running checkpatch on every file and decided to do
At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:02:04 +0530,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced
with corresponding pr_* macros.
Are
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:43:03PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:02:04 +0530,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
as pr_* macros are more preffered over
At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:37:50 +0530,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:43:03PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:02:04 +0530,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:38:10PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:37:50 +0530,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:43:03PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:02:04 +0530,
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM
