Le 21/05/2020 à 12:38, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 21/05/2020 à 09:02, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Arnd Bergmann writes:
+On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Benjamin
On 21. 05. 20 15:53, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Christophe Leroy writes:
>> Le 21/05/2020 à 09:02, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>>> Arnd Bergmann writes:
+On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michael Ellerman
wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>> On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59
Christophe Leroy writes:
> Le 21/05/2020 à 09:02, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>>> +On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michael Ellerman
>>> wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Benjamin
Le 21/05/2020 à 09:02, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Arnd Bergmann writes:
+On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
IBM still put 40x cores inside
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> +On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>> > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>> > IBM still put 40x cores inside POWER chips no ?
>>
>> Oh yeah that's true.
+On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> > IBM still put 40x cores inside POWER chips no ?
>
> Oh yeah that's true. I guess most folks don't know
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>> > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > > I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have
>> > > less
>> > > code in the
Le 08/04/2020 à 01:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have
less
code in the
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:34 AM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> > > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have
> > > less
> > > code in the tree, we struggle to keep even the modern
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have less
>> code in the tree, we struggle to keep even the modern platforms well
>> maintained.
>>
>> At the same time I don't want to render
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 11:07 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:51 PM Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > While we are at it, can we also remove the 601 ? This one is also full
> > > of workarounds and
On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have less
> code in the tree, we struggle to keep even the modern platforms well
> maintained.
>
> At the same time I don't want to render anyone's hardware obsolete
>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:51 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > While we are at it, can we also remove the 601 ? This one is also full
> > of workarounds and diverges a bit from other 6xx.
> >
> > I'm unable to find its end of
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> While we are at it, can we also remove the 601 ? This one is also full
> of workarounds and diverges a bit from other 6xx.
>
> I'm unable to find its end of life date, but it was on the market in
> 1994, so I guess it must be
Le 31/03/2020 à 12:04, Michal Simek a écrit :
On 31. 03. 20 11:49, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 31/03/2020 à 09:19, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 31/03/2020 à 08:59, Michal Simek a écrit :
On 31. 03. 20 8:56, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 31/03/2020 à 07:30, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
On 31. 03. 20 11:49, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 31/03/2020 à 09:19, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Le 31/03/2020 à 08:59, Michal Simek a écrit :
>>> On 31. 03. 20 8:56, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 31/03/2020 à 07:30, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy
Le 31/03/2020 à 09:19, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 31/03/2020 à 08:59, Michal Simek a écrit :
On 31. 03. 20 8:56, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 31/03/2020 à 07:30, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Christophe Leroy writes:
Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 27,
Le 31/03/2020 à 08:59, Michal Simek a écrit :
On 31. 03. 20 8:56, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 31/03/2020 à 07:30, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Christophe Leroy writes:
Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri,
On 31. 03. 20 8:56, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 31/03/2020 à 07:30, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Christophe Leroy writes:
>>> Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy
Le 31/03/2020 à 07:30, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Christophe Leroy writes:
Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200,
Christophe Leroy writes:
> Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27,
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 4:07 PM Christian Lamparter wrote:
>
> (Sorry for the bounces, yes my smarthost mail setup breaks from time to time
> and I had to cut the CC since it complained about the length.)
>
> I guess we should think about upstreaming the MyBook Live DTS. Problem here
> is that we
(Sorry for the bounces, yes my smarthost mail setup breaks from time to time
and I had to cut the CC since it complained about the length.)
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 12:17:58 CET Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM
Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:12
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:12 PM Michal Simek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > recently we wanted to
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:12 PM Michal Simek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function
> > > which we
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:12 PM Michal Simek wrote:
> >
> > recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function
> > which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC
> > platforms. Here is the
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:12 PM Michal Simek wrote:
>
> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function
> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC
> platforms. Here is the thread about it.
>
Hi,
recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function
which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC
platforms. Here is the thread about it.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/
I have been talking about
31 matches
Mail list logo
