Hi Joakim,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:39:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I figure, after 2.4.37.12, a public git tree on kernel org which still
> receives fixes would be enough.
FYI, I've merged your patches and pushed them along with a few pending
other ones here :
http://git.kernel.or
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:39:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > BTW, since you're asking, you seem to still be using 2.4. Do you think it's
> > worth pursuing maintenance over 2.4.37.12 and if so for how long ? I'm
> > asking
> > because until the break-in, I felt like almost nobody was usin
Willy Tarreau wrote on 2012/02/08 10:44:26:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/12/11 18:33:46:
> > >
> > > Hi Joakim,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > > To: Joaki
Hi Joakim,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/12/11 18:33:46:
> >
> > Hi Joakim,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > To: Joakim Tjernlund
> > > > From: Willy Tarreau
> > > >
> > > > Hi Joa
Willy Tarreau wrote on 2011/12/11 18:33:46:
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > To: Joakim Tjernlund
> > > From: Willy Tarreau
> > >
> > > Hi Joakim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund
> > > wrote: > This is a
> > >
Hi Joakim,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > To: Joakim Tjernlund
> > From: Willy Tarreau
> >
> > Hi Joakim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund
> > wrote: > This is a
> > backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU > bugs. 8xx
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> From: Willy Tarreau
>
> Hi Joakim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > This is a
> backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU > bugs. 8xx does not update
> the DAR register
> when taking a TLB > error caused by dcbX and icbi in
Hi Joakim,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
> bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
> error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
> tricky to use these insns. Also the
This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
tricky to use these insns. Also the dcbst wrongly sets the
the store bit when faulting into DTLB error.
A few more bugs ve
