On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:21:41PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:45:05 -0400
> Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > Most of this conversion was done via coccinelle, with a few of the more
> > non-standard accesses done by hand. There should be no behavioral
> > changes with this set.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:52:27PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:45:05 -0400
> > Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > > Most of this conversion was done via coccinelle, with a few of the more
> > > non-standard accesses done
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:45:05 -0400
> Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > Most of this conversion was done via coccinelle, with a few of the more
> > non-standard accesses done by hand. There should be no behavioral
> > changes with this set. That
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:45:05 -0400
Jeff Layton wrote:
> Most of this conversion was done via coccinelle, with a few of the more
> non-standard accesses done by hand. There should be no behavioral
> changes with this set. That will come later, as we convert individual
> filesystems to use
I've been working on a patchset to change how the inode->i_ctime is
accessed in order to give us conditional, high-res timestamps for the
ctime and mtime. struct timespec64 has unused bits in it that we can use
to implement this. In order to do that however, we need to wrap all
accesses of
