> Hmm, I think we got this wrong. I don't remember exactly but it was probably
> me
> who told you it could be removed, but I probably hadn't had a coffee yet :}
>
> I see setup_pci_atmu() called by fsl_pci_syscore_do_resume(), ie. at runtime
> ==
> late. So ignore that.
>
> But also fsl_add_b
On Wed, 2015-25-03 at 05:35:38 UTC, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> The only function that checks ppc_swiotlb_enable is swiotlb_subsys_init.
.. which is a subsys initcall.
> The code in fsl_pci.c is called well after that, so don't bother
> changing it.
Hmm, I think we got this wrong. I don't remember ex
The only function that checks ppc_swiotlb_enable is swiotlb_subsys_init.
The code in fsl_pci.c is called well after that, so don't bother
changing it.
(ppc_swiotlb is usually set in swiotlb_detect_4g, which is called by
a number of arch initcalls.)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens
---
arch/powerpc/
