On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 09:41:38AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe
> > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:12 AM
> >
> > +static int iommu_init_driver(struct device *dev, const struct iommu_ops
> > *ops)
>
> would iommu_init_device() better fit the purpose?
Yeah.. that does se
> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:12 AM
>
> +static int iommu_init_driver(struct device *dev, const struct iommu_ops
> *ops)
would iommu_init_device() better fit the purpose?
otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian
Move the driver init and destruction code into two logically paired
functions.
There is a subtle ordering dependency in how the group's domains are
freed, the current code does the kobject_put() on the group which will
hopefully trigger the free of the domains before the module_put() that
protects
