Re: [PATCH 05/14] phylib: add *_direct() variants of phy_connect and phy_attach functions

2009-04-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Andy Fleming aflem...@freescale.com wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Grant Likely wrote: From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Add phy_connect_direct() and phy_attach_direct() functions so that drivers can use a pointer to the phy_device instead of

Re: [PATCH 05/14] phylib: add *_direct() variants of phy_connect and phy_attach functions

2009-04-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Andy Fleming aflem...@freescale.com wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Grant Likely wrote: From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Add phy_connect_direct() and

Re: [PATCH 05/14] phylib: add *_direct() variants of phy_connect and phy_attach functions

2009-04-15 Thread Andy Fleming
On Mar 31, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Grant Likely wrote: From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Add phy_connect_direct() and phy_attach_direct() functions so that drivers can use a pointer to the phy_device instead of trying to determine the phy's bus_id string. This patch is useful for OF

[PATCH 05/14] phylib: add *_direct() variants of phy_connect and phy_attach functions

2009-03-31 Thread Grant Likely
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Add phy_connect_direct() and phy_attach_direct() functions so that drivers can use a pointer to the phy_device instead of trying to determine the phy's bus_id string. This patch is useful for OF device tree descriptions of phy devices where the driver