Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers

2022-04-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 10:59:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 7:39 PM Benjamin Stürz wrote: > > > > This replaces comments with C99's designated > > initializers because the kernel supports them now. > > Does it follow the conventions which are accepted in the ACPI

Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers

2022-04-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Please fix your mailer. This mail is completely unreadable.

RE: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers

2022-03-31 Thread Moore, Robert
; open list:HFI1 DRIVER ; linux-input ; open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT ; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org; wcn3...@lists.infradead.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers On Sat, Mar 26

Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers

2022-03-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 6:09 PM Benjamin Stürz wrote: > > This replaces comments with C99's designated > initializers because the kernel supports them now. However, note that all of the ACPICA material should be submitted to the upstream ACPICA project via https://github.com/acpica/acpica Also

Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers

2022-03-27 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 7:39 PM Benjamin Stürz wrote: > > This replaces comments with C99's designated > initializers because the kernel supports them now. Does it follow the conventions which are accepted in the ACPI CA project? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko