On 10/11/18 12:33, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:39 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> [resend of my messed up rejected email of a minute ago, sorry]
>
>>
>> On 10/10/18 14:03, Frank Rowand wrote:
< snip >
> I understand you're quite busy with all this, but I'm wondering
> whether it
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:39 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
[resend of my messed up rejected email of a minute ago, sorry]
>
> On 10/10/18 14:03, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 10/10/18 13:40, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:49 AM Frank Rowand
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 10/09/18 23:04,
On 10/10/18 14:03, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 10/10/18 13:40, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/09/18 23:04, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Frank Rowand
"of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new
On 10/10/18 13:40, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 10/09/18 23:04, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Frank Rowand
>>>
>>>
>>> "of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes"
>>> fixed a problem where an 'update property'
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/09/18 23:04, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Frank Rowand
> >
> >
> > "of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes"
> > fixed a problem where an 'update property' changeset entry was
> > created for
On 10/09/18 23:04, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
>
> "of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes"
> fixed a problem where an 'update property' changeset entry was
> created for properties contained in nodes added by a changeset.
> The fix was to
From: Frank Rowand
"of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes"
fixed a problem where an 'update property' changeset entry was
created for properties contained in nodes added by a changeset.
The fix was to use an 'add property' changeset entry.
This exposed more bugs
