2017-10-02, David Gibson:
> Paolo,
>
> Here's BenH's ack. Again, this is a pretty important fix for us, and
> Paulus is away. Can you take this into the KVM tree please.
Applied to kvm/master, thanks.
(Turns out I'm not on any cc'd list, so the author date might be off.)
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:07:13AM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 11:45 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:47:04PM +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> > > In KVM's XICS-on-XIVE emulation, kvmppc_xive_get_xive() returns the
> > > value of
On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 11:45 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:47:04PM +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> > In KVM's XICS-on-XIVE emulation, kvmppc_xive_get_xive() returns the
> > value of state->guest_server as "server". However, this value is not
> > set by it's counterpart
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:47:04PM +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> In KVM's XICS-on-XIVE emulation, kvmppc_xive_get_xive() returns the
> value of state->guest_server as "server". However, this value is not
> set by it's counterpart kvmppc_xive_set_xive(). When the guest uses
> this interface to
In KVM's XICS-on-XIVE emulation, kvmppc_xive_get_xive() returns the
value of state->guest_server as "server". However, this value is not
set by it's counterpart kvmppc_xive_set_xive(). When the guest uses
this interface to migrate interrupts away from a CPU that is going
offline, it sees all
