On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity
This addresses a regression
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity
This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity
for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between
a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq.
...
Are you able to identify when
: Maintain user set affinity
This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity
for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between
a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq.
On example of this is bringing up an ethernet interface
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity
This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity
for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between
a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq
for MSI, affinity is set two times.
also in dynamic_irq_init is setting with
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
cpus_setall(desc-affinity);
#endif
it seems should use irq_default_affinity instead of CPU_MASK_ALL directly
there.
That sounds more like it.
Cheers,
Ben.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:31:05 -0600 (CST)
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity
This addresses
] irq: Maintain user set affinity
This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity
for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between
a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq.
On example of this is bringing up an ethernet interface, taking
