On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 05:36:37 UTC, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Before checking for cpu_type == NULL, this same copy happens, so doing
> it here will just write the same value to the t->oprofile_type
> again.
>
> Remove the repeated copy, as it is unnecessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras
Hello Christophe, thank you for the feedback.
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 07:31 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > if (old.oprofile_cpu_type != NULL) {
> > t->oprofile_cpu_type = old.oprofile_cpu_type;
> > - t->oprofile_type = old.oprofile_type;
> >
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 09:33 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:36 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > Before checking for cpu_type == NULL, this same copy happens, so doing
> > it here will just write the same value to the t->oprofile_type
> > again.
> >
> > Remove the repeated
Le 15/02/2020 à 06:36, Leonardo Bras a écrit :
Before checking for cpu_type == NULL, this same copy happens, so doing
it here will just write the same value to the t->oprofile_type
again.
Remove the repeated copy, as it is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras
---
On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:36 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Before checking for cpu_type == NULL, this same copy happens, so doing
> it here will just write the same value to the t->oprofile_type
> again.
>
> Remove the repeated copy, as it is unnecessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras
LGTM
Before checking for cpu_type == NULL, this same copy happens, so doing
it here will just write the same value to the t->oprofile_type
again.
Remove the repeated copy, as it is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
