On Wednesday 23 April 2008 13:12, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
Ok. I'll submit a new patch as soon as we agree on a compatible name.
Did we?
IIRC, The latest agreement was that we don't need the compatible and
will match on node name.
Ok. Is there a current
David Woodhouse wrote:
Ok. I'll submit a new patch as soon as we agree on a compatible name.
Did we?
IIRC, The latest agreement was that we don't need the compatible and
will match on node name.
Ok. Is there a current patch I should be merging?
Looks like it was decided to
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 10:26 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Ok. I'll submit a new patch as soon as we agree on a compatible name.
Did we?
--
dwmw2
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 00:16 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
Ok. I'll submit a new patch as soon as we agree on a compatible name.
Did we?
IIRC, The latest agreement was that we don't need the compatible and
will match on node name.
Ok. Is there a current
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.c
index 49acd41..65c30b5 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.c
+++
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
{
+.compatible= physmap-ram,
+.data= (void *)map_ram,
+},
+{
+.compatible= physmap-rom,
+.data= (void *)map_rom,
+},
Why the cast? It's redundant afaics.
To be in line with the surrounding
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:34:58PM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
{
+.compatible= physmap-ram,
+.data= (void *)map_ram,
+},
+{
+.compatible= physmap-rom,
+.data= (void *)map_rom,
+},
Why the cast? It's redundant
