Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/MSI/PPC: Remove arch_msi_check_device()

2014-08-29 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 13:21 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > PowerPC is the only architecture that makes use of hook > arch_msi_check_device() and does perform some checks to > figure out if MSI/MSI-X could be enabled for a device. > However, there are no reasons why those checks could not > be do

Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/MSI/PPC: Remove arch_msi_check_device()

2014-08-19 Thread Alexander Gordeev
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:53:33PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > Michael, Ben, > > Any feedback? Michael, Ben? > Thanks! -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agord...@redhat.com ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.o

Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/MSI/PPC: Remove arch_msi_check_device()

2014-07-31 Thread Alexander Gordeev
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:21:07PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > PowerPC is the only architecture that makes use of hook > arch_msi_check_device() and does perform some checks to > figure out if MSI/MSI-X could be enabled for a device. > However, there are no reasons why those checks could not

[PATCH 1/2] PCI/MSI/PPC: Remove arch_msi_check_device()

2014-07-12 Thread Alexander Gordeev
PowerPC is the only architecture that makes use of hook arch_msi_check_device() and does perform some checks to figure out if MSI/MSI-X could be enabled for a device. However, there are no reasons why those checks could not be done within arch_setup_msi_irqs() hook. Moving MSI checks into arch_set