Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl: Fix allowing bogus AFU descriptors with 0 maximum processes

2016-06-29 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 29/06/16 22:16, Ian Munsie wrote: From: Ian Munsie If the AFU descriptor of an AFU directed AFU indicates that it supports 0 maximum processes, we will accept that value and attempt to use it. The SPA will still be allocated (with 2 pages due to another minor bug and

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl: Fix allowing bogus AFU descriptors with 0 maximum processes

2016-06-29 Thread Frederic Barrat
Le 29/06/2016 14:16, Ian Munsie a écrit : From: Ian Munsie If the AFU descriptor of an AFU directed AFU indicates that it supports 0 maximum processes, we will accept that value and attempt to use it. The SPA will still be allocated (with 2 pages due to another minor bug

[PATCH 1/2] cxl: Fix allowing bogus AFU descriptors with 0 maximum processes

2016-06-29 Thread Ian Munsie
From: Ian Munsie If the AFU descriptor of an AFU directed AFU indicates that it supports 0 maximum processes, we will accept that value and attempt to use it. The SPA will still be allocated (with 2 pages due to another minor bug and room for 958 processes), and when a