On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:03:02 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:13 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > The mpc8xx driver uses a reference to NR_IRQS that is buggy. It uses
> > NR_IRQs for the array size of the ppc_cached_irq_mask bitmap, but
> > NR_IRQs could be smaller t
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote on 2012/04/17 03:00:40:
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 02:03 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > If you are going to test 8xx, could you revert
> > e0908085fc2391c85b85fb814ae1df377c8e0dcb,
> > powerpc/8xx: Fix regression introduced by cache coherency rewrite ?
> >
> > I
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 02:03 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> If you are going to test 8xx, could you revert
> e0908085fc2391c85b85fb814ae1df377c8e0dcb,
> powerpc/8xx: Fix regression introduced by cache coherency rewrite ?
>
> It should not be needed after I fixed up the 8xx TLB code and added a
>
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:13 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Ben, I can take these two patches via my irqdomain tree if you prefer.
>
> Let me give them a test run first.
Hi Ben
If you are going to test 8xx, could you revert
e0908085fc2391c85b85fb814ae1df377c8e0dcb,
powerpc/8xx: Fix regression
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:13 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> The mpc8xx driver uses a reference to NR_IRQS that is buggy. It uses
>> NR_IRQs for the array size of the ppc_cached_irq_mask bitmap, but
>> NR_IRQs could be smaller than the
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:13 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Ben, I can take these two patches via my irqdomain tree if you prefer.
>
> Let me give them a test run first.
Yes of course. I won't merge before they've been checked out.
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:13 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Ben, I can take these two patches via my irqdomain tree if you prefer.
Let me give them a test run first.
Cheers,
Ben.
> g.
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
> > The mpc8xx driver uses a reference to NR_IRQS tha
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:13 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> The mpc8xx driver uses a reference to NR_IRQS that is buggy. It uses
> NR_IRQs for the array size of the ppc_cached_irq_mask bitmap, but
> NR_IRQs could be smaller than the number of hardware irqs that
> ppc_cached_irq_mask tracks.
>
> Also
Ben, I can take these two patches via my irqdomain tree if you prefer.
g.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> The mpc8xx driver uses a reference to NR_IRQS that is buggy. It uses
> NR_IRQs for the array size of the ppc_cached_irq_mask bitmap, but
> NR_IRQs could be smaller th
The mpc8xx driver uses a reference to NR_IRQS that is buggy. It uses
NR_IRQs for the array size of the ppc_cached_irq_mask bitmap, but
NR_IRQs could be smaller than the number of hardware irqs that
ppc_cached_irq_mask tracks.
Also, while fixing that problem, it became apparent that the interrupt
10 matches
Mail list logo