12, 2015 6:46 PM
To: Pledge Roy-R01356
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Bucur
Madalin-Cristian-B32716
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/qman: Change fsl,qman-channel-id to
cell- index
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:19 -0500, Pledge Roy-R01356 wrote
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:52:46AM -0500, Pledge Roy-R01356 wrote:
I guess my point isn't getting through - channel-id and cell-index are
too independent concepts that are coincidentally the same. Cell-index
is only used by u-boot and is used to determine the portal number. It
is absolutely
To: Pledge Roy-R01356
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Bucur
Madalin-Cristian-B32716
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/qman: Change fsl,qman-channel-id to cell-
index
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:19 -0500, Pledge Roy-R01356 wrote:
I don't believe
...@vger.kernel.org; Bucur
Madalin-Cristian-B32716
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/qman: Change fsl,qman-channel-id to cell-
index
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:19 -0500, Pledge Roy-R01356 wrote:
I don't believe this is correct - let me explain the rational why
we had two
properties in the QMan
I don't believe this is correct - let me explain the rational why we had two
properties in the QMan portal to begin with.
The two properties in question are cell-index and fsl,qman-channel-id.
The cell-index property is used in u-boot as an index for the software
portal
ID when
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:19 -0500, Pledge Roy-R01356 wrote:
I don't believe this is correct - let me explain the rational why we had
two
properties in the QMan portal to begin with.
The two properties in question are cell-index and fsl,qman-channel-id.
The cell-index
=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Wood
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 6:53 PM
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Bucur Madalin-Cristian-B32716
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/qman: Change fsl,qman-channel-id to cell-index
It turns out
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 11:04 -0500, Pledge Roy-R01356 wrote:
Sorry for the slow reply.
I don't believe this is correct - let me explain the rational why we had two
properties in the QMan portal to begin with.
The two properties in question are cell-index and fsl,qman-channel-id.
The
It turns out that existing U-Boots will dereference NULL pointers
if the device tree does not have cell-index in the portal nodes.
No patch has yet been merged adding device tree nodes for this binding
(except a dtsi that has not yet been referenced), nor has any driver
yet been merged making use
