On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Liu Ping Fan kernelf...@gmail.com writes:
To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in
hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa().
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:50 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote:
why ? , All the hash routines do check for _PAGE_PRESENT via access
variable.
Going through __hash_page_4K(4k on 4k HW), I do not find such check.
Am I wrong? Or I will send out a patch to fix that.
We pass a bitmask of flags to check
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:50 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote:
why ? , All the hash routines do check for _PAGE_PRESENT via access
variable.
Going through __hash_page_4K(4k on 4k HW), I do not find such check.
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Liu Ping Fan kernelf...@gmail.com writes:
To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in
hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa().
For some reason I don't have 2/3 and 3/3 in my mbox (though I do have
them
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Liu Ping Fan kernelf...@gmail.com writes:
To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in
hash_page(), so bail out for the case of
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 14:17 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Liu Ping Fan kernelf...@gmail.com writes:
To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not
Liu Ping Fan kernelf...@gmail.com writes:
To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in
hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa().
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
To enable the do_numa_page(), we should not fix _PAGE_NUMA in
hash_page(), so bail out for the case of pte_numa().
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
