On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Li Yang wrote:
On 4/19/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:34 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
From: Zhao Chenhuib26...@freescale.com
In fsl_of_msi_probe(), the virt_msir's chip_data have been stored
the pointer to struct mpic. We add a
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Apr 18, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Li Yang wrote:
On 4/19/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:34 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
From: Zhao Chenhuib26...@freescale.com
In fsl_of_msi_probe(), the
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:34 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
From: Zhao Chenhui b26...@freescale.com
In fsl_of_msi_probe(), the virt_msir's chip_data have been stored
the pointer to struct mpic. We add a struct fsl_msi_cascade_data
to store the pointer to struct fsl_msi and msir_index. Otherwise,
the
On 4/19/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:34 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
From: Zhao Chenhuib26...@freescale.com
In fsl_of_msi_probe(), the virt_msir's chip_data have been stored
the pointer to struct mpic. We add a struct fsl_msi_cascade_data
to store the pointer to
From: Zhao Chenhui b26...@freescale.com
In fsl_of_msi_probe(), the virt_msir's chip_data have been stored
the pointer to struct mpic. We add a struct fsl_msi_cascade_data
to store the pointer to struct fsl_msi and msir_index. Otherwise,
the pointer to struct mpic will be over-written, and will
