On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 16:55:39 +0530
Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Hello Nicholas,
>
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:53:40AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > I wouldn't have the wrapper function... but it's your code so it's
> > up to you. One thing though is that this function
Hello Nicholas,
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:53:40AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:08:12 +0530
> "Gautham R. Shenoy" wrote:
>
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >
> > The details of the platform idle state are exposed by
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:08:12 +0530
"Gautham R. Shenoy" wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
> The details of the platform idle state are exposed by the firmware to
> the kernel via device tree.
>
> In the current code, we parse the device tree
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
The details of the platform idle state are exposed by the firmware to
the kernel via device tree.
In the current code, we parse the device tree twice :
1) During the boot up in arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c Here,
the device tree is