On Jul 18, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Milton Miller wrote:
>> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Wed Jul 18 11:33:08 EST 2007, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> 1. ft_create_node was returning the internal pointer rather than a
>>> phandle.
>>> 2. ft_find_device_rel was treating lookups relativ
Milton Miller wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed Jul 18 11:33:08 EST 2007, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> 1. ft_create_node was returning the internal pointer rather than a
>> phandle.
>> 2. ft_find_device_rel was treating lookups relative to root as an error.
>
>
> No, it is treatin
On Wed Jul 18 11:33:08 EST 2007, Scott Wood wrote:
> 1. ft_create_node was returning the internal pointer rather than a
> phandle.
> 2. ft_find_device_rel was treating lookups relative to root as an
> error.
No, it is treating lookups relative to NULL as an error.
Your patch changes it to treat
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed Jul 18 11:33:08 EST 2007, Scott Wood wrote:
> 1. ft_create_node was returning the internal pointer rather than a
> phandle.
> 2. ft_find_device_rel was treating lookups relative to root as an
> error.
No, it is treating lookups relative to NULL as an erro
1. ft_create_node was returning the internal pointer rather than a phandle.
2. ft_find_device_rel was treating lookups relative to root as an error.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/flatdevtree.c | 12
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions
