On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:40:23AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Segher Boessenkool's message of June 17, 2021 9:37 am:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:05:27AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >> This ensures that we don't get a decrementer interrupt arriving before
> >> we have set
Nicholas Piggin writes:
> Excerpts from Segher Boessenkool's message of June 17, 2021 9:37 am:
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:05:27AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>>> This ensures that we don't get a decrementer interrupt arriving before
>>> we have set up a handler for it.
>>
>> Maybe add a
Excerpts from Segher Boessenkool's message of June 17, 2021 9:37 am:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:05:27AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>> This ensures that we don't get a decrementer interrupt arriving before
>> we have set up a handler for it.
>
> Maybe add a comment saying this is setting
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:05:27AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> This ensures that we don't get a decrementer interrupt arriving before
> we have set up a handler for it.
Maybe add a comment saying this is setting MSR[EE]=0 for that? Or do
other bits here matter as well?
Segher
Excerpts from Paul Mackerras's message of June 15, 2021 9:05 am:
> This ensures that we don't get a decrementer interrupt arriving before
> we have set up a handler for it.
Would this be better off merged in the previous patch (maybe with
comment)? Why don't other platform_init()s seem to
This ensures that we don't get a decrementer interrupt arriving before
we have set up a handler for it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras
---
arch/powerpc/boot/microwatt.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/microwatt.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/microwatt.c
index
