Re: [PATCH 11/30] um: Improve panic notifiers consistency and ordering

2022-05-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
On 13/05/2022 11:44, Johannes Berg wrote: > [...] >> Maybe Anton / Johannes / Richard could give their opinions - appreciate >> that, I'm not attached to the priority here, it's more about users' >> common usage of UML I can think of... > > It's hard to say ... In a sense I'm not sure it matters?

Re: [PATCH 11/30] um: Improve panic notifiers consistency and ordering

2022-05-13 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 17:22 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > On 10/05/2022 11:28, Petr Mladek wrote: > > [...] > > It is not clear to me why user mode linux should not care about > > the other notifiers. It might be because I do not know much > > about the user mode linux. > > > > Is the

Re: [PATCH 11/30] um: Improve panic notifiers consistency and ordering

2022-05-11 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
On 10/05/2022 11:28, Petr Mladek wrote: > [...] > It is not clear to me why user mode linux should not care about > the other notifiers. It might be because I do not know much > about the user mode linux. > > Is the because they always create core dump or are never running > in a hypervisor or

[PATCH 11/30] um: Improve panic notifiers consistency and ordering

2022-04-27 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Currently the panic notifiers from user mode linux don't follow the convention for most of the other notifiers present in the kernel (indentation, priority setting, numeric return). More important, the priorities could be improved, since it's a special case (userspace), hence we could run the