Re: [PATCH 16/23] s390: gmap use pte_unmap_unlock() not spin_unlock()

2023-05-17 Thread Alexander Gordeev
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 10:02:32PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > pte_alloc_map_lock() expects to be followed by pte_unmap_unlock(): to > keep balance in future, pass ptep as well as ptl to gmap_pte_op_end(), > and use pte_unmap_unlock() instead of direct spin_unlock() (even though > ptep ends up unu

[PATCH 16/23] s390: gmap use pte_unmap_unlock() not spin_unlock()

2023-05-09 Thread Hugh Dickins
pte_alloc_map_lock() expects to be followed by pte_unmap_unlock(): to keep balance in future, pass ptep as well as ptl to gmap_pte_op_end(), and use pte_unmap_unlock() instead of direct spin_unlock() (even though ptep ends up unused inside the macro). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins --- arch/s390/mm