On Feb 4, 2008, at 8:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:46:32AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008, at 1:54 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:41:24PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[snip]
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
I'm not entirely convinced
In message: Re: [PATCH 2/10] sbc8560: Add v1 device tree source for Wind River
SBC8560 board
on 01/02/2008 David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:41:24PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
This adds a v1 device tree source for the Wind River SBC8560 board. The
biggest difference between
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:44:23AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008, at 8:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:46:32AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008, at 1:54 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:41:24PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:46:32AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008, at 1:54 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:41:24PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[snip]
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
I'm not entirely convinced on this two-level representation. I think
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:41:24PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
This adds a v1 device tree source for the Wind River SBC8560 board. The
biggest difference between this and the MPC8560ADS reference platform
dts is the use of an external 16550 compatible UART instead of the CPM2.
This adds a v1 device tree source for the Wind River SBC8560 board. The
biggest difference between this and the MPC8560ADS reference platform
dts is the use of an external 16550 compatible UART instead of the CPM2.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
