On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 10:32 +, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
Thanks for the follow up. Grant wanted to see usage of this outside PPC and I
pointed him[0] to the RFC[1] I had posted to support cacheinfo on ARM.
These patches are based on v3.12-rc1, let me know if you want me to
Hi Ben,
On 31/10/13 05:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:53 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha sudeep.karkadanage...@arm.com
Since the definition of_find_next_cache_node is architecture independent,
the existing definition in powerpc can
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:53 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha sudeep.karkadanage...@arm.com
Since the definition of_find_next_cache_node is architecture independent,
the existing definition in powerpc can be moved to driver/of/base.c
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha sudeep.karkadanage...@arm.com
Since the definition of_find_next_cache_node is architecture independent,
the existing definition in powerpc can be moved to driver/of/base.c
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
Cc:
