On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:52:09AM +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:48 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:22:31AM +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:25 +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
a recent FEC binding document update
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:48 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:22:31AM +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:25 +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
a recent FEC binding document update that was motivated by i.MX
development revealed that ARM and PowerPC
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:22:31AM +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:25 +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
a recent FEC binding document update that was motivated by i.MX
development revealed that ARM and PowerPC implementations in Linux
did not agree on the clock names
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:25 +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
a recent FEC binding document update that was motivated by i.MX
development revealed that ARM and PowerPC implementations in Linux
did not agree on the clock names to use for the FEC nodes
change clock names from per to ipg in the
a recent FEC binding document update that was motivated by i.MX
development revealed that ARM and PowerPC implementations in Linux
did not agree on the clock names to use for the FEC nodes
change clock names from per to ipg in the FEC nodes of the
mpc5121.dtsi include file such that the .dts
