On 27/01/17 16:52, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
basic-block.h includes tm.h, and I don't believe we can remove that. I'm
not convinced there's a way around this.
Includes via function.h, I should say.
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com IBM Australia
On 09/12/16 21:59, PaX Team wrote:
the specific problem addressed here can (and IMHO should) be solved in
another way: remove the inclusion of the offending headers in gcc-common.h
as neither tm.h nor c-common.h are needed by existing plugins. for background,
We can't build without tm.h: http:/
On 9 Dec 2016 at 13:48, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> >> as for the solutions, the general advice should enable the use of otherwise
> >> failing gcc versions instead of forcing updating to new ones (though the
> >> latter is advisable for other reasons but not everyone's in the position to
> >> do so
On 09/12/16 05:06, Kees Cook wrote:
i don't think that this is the right approach. there's a general and a special
issue here, both of which need different handling.
the general problem is to detect problems related to gcc plugin headers and
notify the users about solutions. emitting various mes
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:42 AM, PaX Team wrote:
> On 6 Dec 2016 at 17:28, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>
>> Enable support for GCC plugins on powerpc.
>>
>> Add an additional version check in gcc-plugins-check to advise users to
>> upgrade to gcc 5.2+ on powerpc to avoid issues with header files (gcc <
On 6 Dec 2016 at 17:28, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Enable support for GCC plugins on powerpc.
>
> Add an additional version check in gcc-plugins-check to advise users to
> upgrade to gcc 5.2+ on powerpc to avoid issues with header files (gcc <=
> 4.6) or missing copies of rs6000-cpus.def (4.8 to 5
On 07/12/16 08:25, Emese Revfy wrote:
What are these missing headers? Because if they aren't necessary then they can
be removed from gcc-common.h. There were missing headers on arm/arm64 and these
archs are supported. I think this version check is unnecessary because
gcc-plugin.sh also checks the
On 06/12/16 17:28, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
Enable support for GCC plugins on powerpc.
Add an additional version check in gcc-plugins-check to advise users to
upgrade to gcc 5.2+ on powerpc to avoid issues with header files (gcc <=
4.6) or missing copies of rs6000-cpus.def (4.8 to 5.1 on 64-bit t
On 07/12/16 07:40, Kees Cook wrote:
Compile tested with all plugins enabled on gcc 4.6-6.2,
x86->ppc{32,64,64le} and 4.8-6.2 ppc64le->ppc{32,64,64le}. Thanks to
Chris Smart for help with this.
I assume also tested on 5.2? :)
Tested on the latest subrevision of every release branch up till 6.2
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:28:00 +1100
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> + # Various gccs between 4.5 and 5.1 have bugs on powerpc due to missing
> + # header files. gcc <= 4.6 doesn't work at all, gccs from 4.8 to 5.1
> have
> + # issues with 64-bit targets.
> + ifeq ($(ARCH),powerpc)
>
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Donnellan
wrote:
> Enable support for GCC plugins on powerpc.
>
> Add an additional version check in gcc-plugins-check to advise users to
> upgrade to gcc 5.2+ on powerpc to avoid issues with header files (gcc <=
> 4.6) or missing copies of rs6000-cpus.def (
Enable support for GCC plugins on powerpc.
Add an additional version check in gcc-plugins-check to advise users to
upgrade to gcc 5.2+ on powerpc to avoid issues with header files (gcc <=
4.6) or missing copies of rs6000-cpus.def (4.8 to 5.1 on 64-bit targets).
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
